Skip Navigation

The Journal of Theological Studies 2006 57(2):487-499; doi:10.1093/jts/fli282
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuckett, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Nomina Sacra in Codex E

C. M. Tuckett

Pembroke College, Oxford

Correspondence: christopher.tuckett{at}theology.ox.ac.uk

Codex E is a bi-lingual manuscript containing the text of Acts in Greek and Latin. The use of so-called ‘nomina sacra in the manuscript presents one or two unusual features. In the Greek column, most of the expected abbreviations occur; but there are over twenty occurrences where one would expect to find an abbreviation for one of the four alleged ‘base’ words of the system (God, Christ, Jesus, Lord) but where the word is written in full. Proportionally (in relation to the length of the manuscript), this figure may be unusually high. In the Latin column, there are virtually no abbreviations at all, a phenomenon which is very unusual amongst Latin biblical manuscripts. The article attempts primarily to present this evidence. In addition, some possible further considerations are offered which might suggest (albeit tentatively) that the number of non-abbreviations in the Greek column may have been even higher in an earlier Vorlage of the text. Hence codex E appears to be a witness to the fact that the abbreviations of some of the key words, even in Christian biblical manuscripts, may not have been as uniform as some in recent studies have maintained.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.