Skip Navigation



The Journal of Theological Studies Advance Access published online on August 11, 2006
The Journal of Theological Studies, doi:10.1093/theolj/fll049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/2/500    most recent
fll049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cain, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org available online at www.jts.oxfordjournals.org

Original Papers

Vox clamantis in deserto: Rhetoric, Reproach, and the Forging of Ascetic Authority in Jerome's Letters from the Syrian Desert

Andrew Cain 1 *

1 University of Colorado

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Andrew Cain, E-mail: Andrew.Cain{at}colorado.edu


  Abstract

In eight letters (Epp. 6-9, 11-13, 16) that Jerome sent from his monastic retreat in the Syrian desert between c.375 and c.377, he sharply criticized friends who were not as faithful in writing to him as he had been to them. John Kelly, in his influential biography of Jerome (1975), famously read these letters as the petty outbursts of a neurotic curmudgeon who was bitter and resentful about being snubbed; other scholars since have followed suit with this face-value interpretation. The present article challenges this widely accepted psychologizing reading as being uncritical and unappreciative of the letters as literary artefacts. It is demonstrated first that they are stylish specimens of the epistolary genre of reproach. It is then argued that these letters, inasmuch as they portray Jerome as being shunned by human society, were important components of a book of collected personal correspondence that Jerome released in Rome in the early 380s to promote himself as the consummate hermit and hero of desert asceticism.

An earlier version of this essay was read in January 2004 at the Annual Meeting of the American Philological Association in San Francisco. A later version was delivered as an invited lecture to the Department of Classics at Columbia University in March 2005. I would like to thank Charles Brittain, Catherine Conybeare, and Mark Vessey for reading an advanced draft of this article and offering well-met suggestions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.